It is a matter of fact and concern that NOTA has also been allowed and approved in the present system of democracy and voting to facilitate the citizens of India

WHERE THERE EXISTS ANY OPTION FOR THE REQUIRED BENEFITS IN FAVOUR OF THE CITIZENS/ EMPLOYEES THERE IS NO BAR    :-- The fundamental rights issued to the citizens of this country are used and exercised as per the option of the concerned and eligibility criteria mentioned in the law and rules In accordingly the RTI has been declared as the fundamental right of the citizens but it is the preference and option of the concerned to follow and use and exercise the right and benefits of the empowerment delivered for the agenda of governance  however it is the preference of the concerned to follow the instructions and guidelines issued for the provision made however in the case of vote to elect the government if people want to byecot the voting schedule they have right to prefer nota by virtue of which they have exercised their power to elect the government and the candidate as such the number of nota may also effect the results of the elections so it is up to the citizens to opt for the system issued for the welfare of society and circle and also to bring transparency in the administration and work for the agenda of the government as per their preference and choice / option required to be used and exercised at the place where the provision made by the government and there is no reason and logic to unnecessary compel any one to work and conduct against the interest of beneficiaries as such the interest of no one could be retrospective ly operated by reason of the retrospective operation of the rules as the constitution has been empowered to initiate the necessary suo moto cognizance in this behalf of the determination to ensure equitable relief measures up to the possible extent required to be maintained and protected by the study of protocol mentioned as in the law code and monitored with the provision made and guaranteed for the welfare of society and circle to recover the losses occured due to unusual practices of the management and administration for which penal action against the defaulters PIO and other concerned has been suggested how ever if higher authority don't verify the facts finding reports the matter may be brought to the notice of the High courts is also a provision under the law and the disciplinary action has also been suggested in addition to the penalty proposed for which the annual reporting of the all SIC and the CIC is proof however required action is supposed to be initiated by the activists working for the agenda of attached application processed before the PIO , FAA and the SIC or CIC in this behalf of the redressal of grievances.