NEED FOR SPEEDY DISPOSAL OF WORK AND FINAL DISPOSAL OF CASES.

Efficiency in administration and need for speedy disposal of work is declared essential after the introduction of the RTI and the RTS act adjudication and it should be realised by the government servants that the administrative delays are becoming a source of discontent and the delay breeds corruption and effective implementation of the Government policies and programmes largely depends upon an efficient and speedy disposal of work. At the same time monitoring of disposal, identification of delays and remedial action is necessary as per the time limit for disposal of references, processing of papers containing information, instructions or decision and conclusion of the Head of the offices and the Heads of the departments as well as the Government corridor, so there quick and efficient processing is therefore the first step towards improving the office efficiency. As per law code manual prefixed by the department of administrative reforms the Government has issued instructions to the all offices where in the time limit for the disposal of the cases at the level of officers higher than the branch officer, including the Heads of departments and the administrative Secretaries will be one week from the date of receipt of a reference/case received by them. As for as final disposal of reference is concerned, it is essential that what ever information is required /wanting in the case, should be asked for in the first back reference and there should normally be no need to make further reference. To check this tendency of repeated back references, and to ensure prompt disposal of references, the Government have laid down the time limits for final disposal of references. These time limits for the three categories of references are as follows:-- Immediate--one month, Urgent--two months and ordinary--three months. The above periods are the maximum limits within which the cases should be finally disposed of by the Departments. However, every effort should be made to finalise the cases in the shortest time possible.

NEED FOR SPEEDY DISPOSAL OF WORK AND FINAL DISPOSAL OF THE IMMEDIATE/IMPORTANT RECEIPT, REQUIRED TO BE MENTIONED IN THE PENDING FINALISATION OVER 3 MONTHS.

Former Vidhan sabha Speaker Shri Radha Raman Shastri has issued a statement today on Monday in the paper (Amar Ujala) dated 17-4-2022 and has criticised the office working in the state of Himachal Pradesh as defeating the very purpose for which the official machinery is working,as procedural compliance has been reduced to mere red-tape and delays occuring in the disposal of cases frequently no action taken by the government.The references received are kept pending and no realisation found necessary in the source of discontent and delay breeding corruption in the system of governance under the Provision made by RTI act publications and too by the RTS act adjudication for which the government offices are responsible for the effective implementation of Government policies and programmes largely depending upon the efficiency of the speedy disposal of work, monitoring,it's identification of delay and dereliction of duty as well as required remedial measures, systematic decision making and inspections for the time limit allowed for the disposal at the level of section officer and the Middle level Officer and the Head of the office working for the good governance and accountability under law code manual prefixed by the government to check the tendency and to ensure prompt disposal of references , and the government instructions have laid down the time limits for final disposal of references with in the following categories of references:- Immediate --One month (2) Urgent -- Two months and the Ordinary --Three months .These time limits are to be reckoned from the date of the receipt of the first or original reference.It is made clear that the final disposal doesn't mean disposal by interim replies etc . and final disposal mean disposal off the case by finally deciding on the issues raised in the original reference and sending reply/clarifications/orders etc.Till then the receipt is to be shown as pending and this pendency has to be mentioned in the statements of cases pending finalisation over 3 months from the month that the receipt of the original reference has become over three months old.The above periods are the maximum limits within which the cases should be finally disposed of by the Departments . However,every effort should be made required to finalise the cases in the shortest time possible.

THE TIME LIMITS FOR IMMEDIATE DISPOSAL OF CASES HAS BEEN LAID DOWN ONE MONTH AND THE URGENT CASES TO BE DISPOSED WITH IN TWO MONTHS WHERE AS THE GENERAL DISPOSAL OF CASES MAY HAVE THREE MONTHS TO FINALLY DISPOSE OF THE REFERENCES POINTED

Interest of no one could be retrospectively operated by reason of the operation of the law code manual prefixed by the government and the constitution of India for which the people of country are responsible to protect the democratic set up country as such corruption could not be removed from the system of governance and Society and circle till it is captured and highlighted before the system for service however further it is the duty and responsibility of the public authorities to watch and ward the deemed action against the defaulters however it has become difficult for the RTI activists and the volunteers to work on the captioned subject matter deliberation required to be maintained by the courts for which the advocates may come forward and look into the matter instead of working on the political alignment the legal people may help the society and circle by way of factual assessment and procedural processing of the RTI act publications as well as the RTS act brought  with the provision of Complaint and submission before the designated officers for which the legal course could not be ignored and denied however it is said to be deleted from the system of governance after two years of the prefixed continuity even though cases are lying pending with the government and Public authorities since the very long and no required review and revision of the such cases have been done at the level of the government for which the designated officers and the Public authorities are responsible to deal with the case files and the matters for which the applicants could not be held responsible to deny the approach for legal services as such the law of limitation prefixed by the RTI act publications and too by the study of protocol mentioned in the RTS act adjudication may apply for the ignorance of law which is related to the designated officers and the Public information officers .