EVERY GOVERNMENT SERVICE MUST BE BROUGHT UNDER THE AMBIT OF RTS AND HAVE A CHARTER OF THE PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY PREFIXED TO FOLLOW LAW CODE MANUAL OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE GUARANTEE ACT 2011

Every public service is required to brought under the ambit of the Public service guarantee act 2011 for which the government has included maximum number of services of the government departments under RTS which includes amendments in the family identity card, property ID ,water connection and the sewerage connection MNREGA, ,mark sheet of the students, Degree, school leaving certificate, Incentive schemes scheduled for benefits .The feedback given by the citizens of Society and circle is considered by the respective Commission and penal action may be taken against the defaulters not taking serious concern about the charter of public accountability and if the negligence of the any officer is found correct and relevant then he may be summoned and penalty of Rupees twenty thousand may be imposed upon the such officers and if any officer is subjected to such penalty thrice , he will be terminated. The time to time line of settlement of cases under pendency must have appropriate action as per the provisos to law of limitation prefixed by the study of protocol mentioned in the listed RTS and placed before Public authoritiy under Public service guarantee act 2011 by the complainants.

SOME DEPARTMENTS ARE YET RELUCTANT TO FOLLOW LAW CODE MANUAL OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE GUARANTEE ACT 2011

RTI act publications 2005 and the public service guarantee act 2011 are issued by the government of India and the state governments to protect the fundamental rights of the common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance by way and virtue of which the people of country may take benefit of the both publications time to time revised by the government of India as well as by the state governments however people are yet unaware about the use and exercise of these provisions particularly issued by the government to bring transparency and accountability in the administration and remove corruption from the system of governance however it is regretted to point the appointment of commissioners in the SICs and increasing pendency in the courts of the SIC or CIC more over the Public service guarantee act 2011 has been declared functional by the government but still it requires due compliance at the behest of the number of departments even though no delay is required after the pronouncement of this act but still maximum departments are reluctant to follow the law of limitation as per the schedule under law code manual prefixed by the study of protocol mentioned in the public service guarantee act 2011 for which the people should approach through the RTI act publications and the Public service guarantee act 2011 jointly before the FAA and SIC or CIC for redressal of their grievances failing which the said Public service guarantee act 2011 could never be implemented by the public authorities,as the Applicants are too responsible to protect their fundamental rights through legitimate approach before the competent higher authority responsible to reply the queries and Applications furnished by the concerned persons under law code manual of the RTI act publications and the Public service guarantee act 2011 adjudged for the required compliance with provision of the time bar prefix ,as per the schedule given by the HOD of every department but it is regretted to point that the number of departments are still reluctant to follow the Public service guarantee act 2011 even this much cross and pass of the decision to follow said instructions of the government

MORE AND MORE AWARENESS DRIVE MOVEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THE CREATION OF INTRODUCTION AND IDENTITY TO FOLLOW LAW CODE MANUAL OF RTI AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE GUARANTEE ACT 2011

RTI activists must work for the RTI awareness and promotion of RTI act publications for which the introduction and identity of the RTI groups/societies and the Organisation must be brought to the notice of all members joining the online meetings and events organised by the various groups and organisations to promote the RTI act publications. During the course of held meeting attended on 12-9-2021 arranged by the MP Group of society members it was revealed that people are taking keen interest to get their problems resolved through the RTI act publications however they still requires guidance and help to learn more about the RTI act adjudication for which it is necessary to protect the fundamental rights and join hands with the group members of the society and circle so that necessary help as required for the proceedings to be argued before the FAA and SIC or CIC may be discussed and finalised with the guidance of the senior members attending the meeting on every Sunday scheduled at 11 am .In addition to the RTI act publications the people must have knowledge and skill experience about the Public service guarantee act 2011 so that necessary benefits of the time bound schedule given by the government may be demanded by the applicants under law code manual of the provision made and created for the awareness drive of the general public demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance failing which it is very difficult to have some utilities and experience on the captioned subject matter deliberation noticed by the study of impact assessment realised by the individual concerned responsible to protect his fundamental rights issued by the constitution of India since 2005 .Though several groups and activists are working on the captioned subject matter deliberation noticed by the study of protocol mentioned in the RTI act publications however still it requires more and more identity and introduction at the level of National compaign committee working under the chairmanship of Shri Sailesh Gandhi former CIC however more and more needs are required to improve the creation and awareness drive movement of the RTI act adjudication along with the provision made by Public service guarantee act 2011 so that Common man may get benefits of the both installation governed by the citizens of country under law code manual prefixed by the constitution of India to take use and exercise of the provision made and created for the welfare of society and circle as well as the individuals concerned responsible to protect his fundamental rights .

RTI ACT ADJUDICATION AND DEMAND UNDER PUBLIC SERVICE GUARANTEE ACT 2011 MAY BENEFIT CITIZENS OF COUNTRY AS REQUIRED FOR REDRESSAL OF THEIR GRIEVANCES, RELATED TO THE ACTION TAKEN REPORT BY THE SYSTEM FOR SERVICE TO CITIZENS OF COUNTRY

It is not correct to say that RTI Applicants/ volunteers/ Resource persons can not ask informations under the RTI act publications 2005 from the Public information officers As such the government of India and the state of have too introduced the Public service guarantee act 2011 for the welfare of society and circle so any information may be obtained and requested from the system of governance for which application / representation/ Complaint of the applicant exists with the concerned public authorities failing which there is no logic of the Public service guarantee act issued to the citizens of country for redressal of their grievances. As such now every RTI activists/ volunteer / resource person may follow the explanation of the Public service guarantee act 2011 along with the provision made and created by the study of protocol mentioned in the RTI act publications and ask for the benefits of the both publications jointly in the interest of justice and transparency and accountability in the administration and also to remove corruption from the system of governance

PUBLIC SERVICE GUARANTEE ACT 2011 AND THE RTI ACT ADJUDICATION MUST BE RELATED WITH EACH OTHER TO REPLY THE QUERIES OF APPLICANTS

RTI act publications 2005 and the Public service guarantee act 2011 are related to each other so the reply and query of the public information officer with the plea that information pertaining to the RTI act publications could not be treated as questionnaire and asked for the action taken report of the existing Complaint, representation and Application submitted by the applicant is not relevant under the provision made by the Public service guarantee act 2011 .As such the action taken report of any subject matter deliberation noticed by the study of protocol mentioned in the RTI act publications may be obtained from the system of governance as well as the Public authoritiy working on behalf of the government to protect the fundamental rights of the common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance.It is necessary to protect the safety measures of the public service guarantee act 2011 along with the provision of RTI act publications 2005 for which every RTI activists should put his demand before the FAA and SIC or CIC accordingly and fight for his right cause of action taken report eligible under the law code manual of public service guarantee act

NO INFORMATION COULD BE DENIED ON THE DEMAND OF ACTION TAKEN REPORT MADE ELIGIBLE UNDER PUBLIC SERVICE GUARANTEE ACT 2011 AS RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW CHARTER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY

The citizens of country have been empowered under the RTI act publications to get their informations obtained from the relevant public offices / authorities for which people also have an opportunity to ask about their demand under public utilities and action taken report of the  pertinent information or access to information through Application/ representation/ Complaint but it is a matter of fact and concern that maximum number of Official staff working on the captioned subject matter deliberation required to be verified under the provision of RTI act publications reply with the tunning that information could not be generated by the study of protocol mentioned in the RTI act publications however it is very clear on the captioned subject matter deliberation noticed by the study of impact assessment realised by the public service guarantee act 2011 that public authorities are too responsible to deliver requisite information of the action taken report demanded by the Applicants/ activists/ volunteers/Resource persons by way and virtue of which the reply of of the concerned authorities could not be considered as right and justified as too responsible to take action on the respective Application submitted by the Applicants before the office

GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE TIMELY JUSTICE TO THE PEOPLE OF COUNTRY AND ARRANGE FOR THE GOOD GOVERNANCE AND TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS

PENDENCY OF CASES IN THE COMMISSION AND FUNCTION OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE GUARANTEE ACT 2011 :-- The CIC as well as the SIC are bound to follow law of limitation under law code manual of the RTI act publications but it is regretted to point the pendency of cases in the SIC as well as the CIC for which the vacant posts of the chair persons have been made responsible for delay in deciding the cases .On the other hand the government is committed to follow the public service guarantee act 2011 by way and virtue of which no office work could be delayed by the public authorities as mentioned in the existing  charter of the public accountability .As such section 18 to 20 of the RTI act publications are adjudicating the delay in deciding cases with penalty and the disciplinary action but neither the RTI act publications are taking suo motu cognizance of the said guidelines of the RTI act publications due to delay in deciding the cases nor the public service guarantee act 2011 implemented as required under the provision of instructions laid down by the study of protocol mentioned in the act ibid and the public is facing undue harassment by way of delay in deciding the cases both ways

PUBLIC ORGANISATIONS ARE TOO RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW DEMAND UNDER PUBLIC UTILITIES AND WORK FOR THE GOOD GOVERNANCE AS WELL AS RTI

Political parties and people are said to be working for the welfare of common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance for which they are too responsible to protect the fundamental rights of the Citizens of country and bring transparency and accountability in the administration so that people may not face corruption in work done by the study of impact assessment realised by themselves In Accordingly the government has bring charter of public accountability act inthe country known as the public service guarantee act and too furnished the RTI act publications Act 2005 for which the government is responsible to follow reports of the SIC or CIC and remove problems of the common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance however it is regretted to point the appointment of one number SIC in Himachal Pradesh for which number of requests have been made before the competent higher authority for appointing the SIC but nothing has been done so for even the post is vacant since July 2020 Under these circumstances it is difficult to follow law of limitation as government itself is delaying the procedural processing of public service guarantee act 2021 as well as the RTI act publications particularly issued for the good governance and charter of public accountability as people facing corruption in the day to day operations of their work and observation prefixed by the study of protocol mentioned in the RTI act publications since 2005 and required to be noticed by the Vidhan sabha as well as the parliament to bring corrective measures in the act and conduct of the public authorities dealing with the provision made and created for the welfare of society and circle