GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE TO DECIDE MODE OF RECRUITMENT AND APPOINTMENT OF THE POST WITH THE REVIEW AND INTEREST OF THE OPERATION OF THE RULE, INSTEAD OF CLOSE DOOR ENDING.

It is a matter of the consideration of question whether , having regard to the role to be performed by a specific cadre or service,it is necessary to provide for direct intake of officers at an appropriate level with a view to injecting fresh knowledge and experience that may not be normally available in a particular service or department,etc The field of selection under the various methods should be clearly specified.If promotion is kept as a method of recruitment it is also necessary to lay down the number of years of qualifying service before the person in the field becomes eligible for promotion.In case where the field of promotion consists of only one post,the method of recruitment by "transfer on deputation (including short term contact)/promotion"is prescribed so that the departmental officer is considered along with the outsiders.If the departmental candidate is selected for appointment to the post ,it is to be treated as having been filled by promotion otherwise the post is to be filled by deputation/contact for the prescribed period of deputation/contact at the end of which the departmental officer will again be afforded an opportunity to be considered for appointment to the post .The issue and matter is related to the period of probation ,if any and methods of recruitment:- whether by direct recruitment or by promotion or by deputation/transfer and the different methods of recruitment,viz:- (1) Promotion (2) Direct Recruitment (3) Deputation (4) Transfer (5) Re-employment (6) Short -term contract, and the percentage of vacancies to be filled by each method that may be prescribed by a particular post or service  (2) the nature of duties, qualifications and experience required.(b) the availability of the suitable Personnel possessing the requisite qualifications and experience with in a cadre (c) the need for ensuring that suitable incentives exists for the maintenance of an adequate standard of efficiency in the cadre .In this behalf it is particularly mentioned here that the department of Public Works in Himachal Pradesh issued post of Extra Assistant Engineer to the junior Engineer after 18 years of experience and regular service in the scale and grade but instead of to follow the mode of recruitment and appointment for the post placed at promotional level placement vide number PW-CE-CZ -CPS/99 -4821 dated 21-5-99 the department started penalties like withheld of increments,reduction in grade and compulsory retirement even denied by the Advisory departments ie HP finance vide number Fin -C - (B)-7-9/78 dated 28-7-84 and again denied by the pay commission recommendations on 3-1-2022 with the comments that increments of the senior government employees should have not been stopped/ with held by way of penalty or otherwise and option would be considered final and irrevocable one but the issue and matter yet pending for finalisation even over due for monthly statement of cases pending finalisation over for 3 months wef 3-1-2022 for which number of complaints furnished before the all concerned regarding to decide the former cases of ACPS but nothing concrete has been done by the department of public Works and on the other hand the cadre of draftsman promoted by the government during the tenure of 1-1-86 to 1-1-96 onwards however no benefits released by the Heads of office even letter of modification issued under the provison made by rule 10 (5)(c) of CCS &CCA -1965 while appeal against penalty considered for the appointment of one post existing in the second channels of Promotion claiming rank seniority over and above the promotion of junior cadre of draftsman too getting promotion under the provision of recruitment and promotion rules. The government is responsible to decide the former cases of ACPS as per confirmation and held review and promotion in the second channels of Promotion so clarified vide number Fin -PR-B (7) -1/2021 dated 3-1-2022 however case file still pending for due benefits even Introduction with clarity at number of occasions :- Er Fateh Chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association Registered number HPCD 3552 Bilaspur Himachal Pradesh