POLICY AND THE PRESENT SYSTEM MAINTAINING GROUP IDENTITIES INSTEAD OF THE INTRODUCTION BY AN INDIVIDUAL CONCERNED.

Our early leaders chose to focus on the individual and for which the Dr Ambedkar said that the draft constitution has discarded the village and adopted the individual as it's unit .The importance of the traditional groups has also been recognised by the Constitution and the subsequent policies of the government.For example different civil codes governed different religions groups through the constitution 's directives , principles proposed to move eventually to a uniform civil code.It is felt that in the present our leaders have changed towards the traditional group identities instead of the introduction of an individual's and taking the use and exercise of the group identities for the empowerment to elect representatives consequently the inequality has fallen.On the other hand it is easy to be United on the name of a group or community and demand for the share of development funds or other facilities from the system of governance taking cognizance of the article 19 of the constitution of India however it is difficult to push or alter the individual's circumstances that would enhance the pie thus the most disadvantaged members of the group get the least benefit from group privileges . various types of reservations are attained by way of the group identities and welcomed by the political movement in social and economical mobility,however it is different in case of the individual concerned even your genuine rights and entitlements are not given to the field of choice and performance made by the individual and at the same time the group identities are recognised by the present leaders working for the welfare of society and circle and doing the needful under law code manual prefixed by the constitution of India. Relatively every group identities are recognised even the benefits so assured are not given to every one for which there is no resentment among the community people.The Group identity is also maintained by the work and conduct of the individuals and for which the focus of policy and politics should be maintained accordingly as required in the case of the RTI act publications and too the RTS act adjudication where ability and performance of an individual is required to be maintained by the applicant, activist or volunteer challenging the wrong doings and misleading informations of the public authorities at various plateforms of the government offices .As such the present system of governance must follow the ability and capability of the individual instead of the demand for the group identities.