GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF AN OUT SOURCE EMPLOYEE (EX-SERVICE MAN) ONE WHO HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE SERVICE WITHOUT TAKING ANY COGNIZANCE OF THE PROCEDURE FOR CONSIDERATION.

It was an occasion of a meeting with the Director Sainik Welfare Organisation Hamirpur and the officer on duty posted from the HP administrative services there in the organisation in connection with the Appeal against the dismissal of services of an ex serviceman Shri Ravinder Singh who has been removed from services from the Temple complex duty at Shri Naina Devi ji.A RTI application has already been submitted to the office for supply of documents related to the dismissal of services of said security officer on 22-6-2023 as such no charge sheet , enquiry report and the findings of the case file expedited and direct dismissal orders issued by the Director of the Sainik welfare organisation which is highly objectionable matter of fact and concern to be verified by the appellate authority and remove the illegal orders of the said ex service man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance under law code manual however facing unnecessary harassment even no warning letter issued to the ex service man removed from the service is proof and evidence on the record.On the other hand organisation has no support of charges levelled and oral evidences obtained from the Temple office ,the employer of the all such ex-servicemen working for their livelihood in the temple complex and doing the duty for the work and welfare of the visitors however their posting is concerned with the organisation of the Sainik welfare organisation but they are supposed to act according to the advisory of the Temple officer.The temple officer of the Mata Naina Devi ji temple complex is satisfied with the duty and responsibility of Shri Ravinder Singh but the case file of appeal against the Major penalty of removal from service lying pending with the above organisation and the Director of the said organisation assured the review of said penal action (Removal from service) which has no reason therefor , as neither any enquiry report is furnished nor show cause notice issued to the appellant before issue of direct dismissal from the service and for which the Director of the Sainik welfare organisation stated that there is no such necessity under law as the employee is working on the out source cadre of security service .