GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROACTIVE DISCLOSURE GUIDELINES AND ISSUE APPOINTMENTS OF THE NODAL OFFICERS, AS (SIC) IS IN DEFUNCT POSITION, SINCE LONG.

Institutional transparency and accountability will remain key to sustainable progress for the ongoing system maintained by the plan and schemes and based on the data governing, but it is necessary to protect the quality index and its benchmark for the annual performance review and monitoring required for the good governance and charter of public accountability, where efficiency in administration can drive for the changes made under law code manual prefixed by the open data platform maintained by the Executive Agency and must be scaled up both for the public availability and the access to information, where the concerned Ministries must upload data sets in standardised formats regularly, enabling access to real time up date for the practical experience and figures before the entire department and the Ministry for enforcing law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India, in this behalf, where as the Heads of the departments are taking no cognisance of the reports and returns required under timelines and it is becoming a routine practice to ignore the guidelines and protocols for the required progress and achievement for the good governance and accountability where timelines are always preferred and maintained to protect the efficiency in administration, in addition to accuracy and correctness of the every decision making under provision made for good governance and charter of public accountability. As such it is therefore necessary for each public authority as well as Ministry to appoint a senior officer not below the rank of a Joint Secretary and not below the rank of a additional HOD, in case of the attached offices for ensuring compliance with the proactive disclosure guidelines. The nodal officer would work under the supervision of the Secretary of the Ministry/Department or the HOD of the attached office, as the case may be. Nodal officers of Ministry/Department and HOD separately should also ensure that the formations below the Ministry/Department/Attached office also disclose the information as per the proactive disclosure guidelines. It is particularly mentioned here that information related to department of (AR) memo dated 4-10-2023 referred by the Secretary of the department vide number PBW -AB (1) -3/2015 dated 26-10-2023 has no follow up at circle level and fiduciary related disclosure of pertinent information kept pending by the Public Information officer and FAA for which the Joint Secretary of the department of(AR) time and again writing to the Secretary (PW) for needful under section 19(6) of the RTI Act, 2005 however there is no intervention by the HOD and also by the CE (HZ) , HPPWD, Hamirpur and pending issue still pending for due compliance under guidelines for the timeline processed since order in Appeal number 12/ 2023 dated, 30-1-2024 and information issued free of cost since 10-2-2024 to date further comments by the department of Administrative reforms taking cognisance of the Ministry and the Office of the Honourable Chief Minister since memo number:- Secy /CM -154297 dated  9-12-2024 but there is no decision making at the level of HoD as well as the additional HoD and appellant facing delay and dereliction because of such ignorance setting out the practical regime to information for citizens, under the control of public authorities. On the other hand there is no SIC and SCIC in the defunct status of office for the decision making and redressal of grievances at Commission levels:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377.