HOD AND THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS ORGANIZATION WORKING FOR THE GOOD GOVERNANCE AND TRANSPARENCY IN ADMININISTRATION RESPOSIBLE TO FOLLOW COMPLAINTS RELATED TO THE RTI AND RTS AND FOLLOW SPEAKING ORDERS FOR THE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST THE DEFAULTERS.

CCS (Conduct) Rule 3(2) provides that every government servant holding a supervisory post is required to take all possible steps to ensure the integrity and devotion to duty of all government servants under the control and authority.The rule also requires that no government servant shall inthe performance of his official duties or in the exercise of powers conferred on him ,act , otherwise than in his best judgement except when he is acting under the directions of his official superior and further that a government servant receiving the oral directions from his official superior shall seek confirmation of the same in writting as early as possible.At the same time,a government servant will not evade his responsibilities by seeking instructions from , or approval of,a superior Officer or authority when such instructions are not necessary under the scheme of distribution of powers and responsibilities.The rule 13 of the CCS(Conduct) Rule places restrictions on acceptance of gifts by the government servant himself and on his permitting any member of his family to accept the gifts and the rule 20 forbids a government servant from bringing and attempting to bring any political or other outside influence to bear upon any superior authority to further his interests in respect of the matters pertaining to his services under the government. As such delay and dereliction of duty is required to be assessed under law code manual prefixed by the government under CCS (Conduct) Rules and necessary disciplinary proceedings may be initiated against the defaulters at the level of the department of Administrative reforms and the appropriate government as Complaints furnished under article 350 of the constitution before the government is proof and evidence on the record however no action asked for the non compliance and dereliction of duty at the level of government pending finalisation over 3 months as due in the cases must have vision and scrutiny by the government and the department of Administrative reforms failing which it is difficult to get benefits of the RTI and RTS act adjudication and for which the government is responsible to do the needful and bring transparency and accountability in the administration.